David Akers vs Jake Elliott who was considered better
| NAME | SEASON | TM | GP | FGA | FGM | FG% | XPA | XPM | XP% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  | D. Akers | 1998 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 2 | 100.0 | |
| 2 | | D. Akers | 1999 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 50.0 | 2 | 2 | 100.0 | |
| 3 | | D. Akers | 2000 | 16 | 33 | 29 | 87.9 | 36 | 34 | 94.4 | |
| 4 | | D. Akers | 2001 | 16 | 31 | 26 | 83.9 | 38 | 37 | 97.4 | |
| 5 | | D. Akers | 2002 | 16 | 34 | 30 | 88.2 | 43 | 43 | 100.0 | |
| 6 | | D. Akers | 2003 | 16 | 29 | 24 | 82.8 | 42 | 42 | 100.0 | |
| 7 | | D. Akers | 2004 | 16 | 32 | 27 | 84.4 | 42 | 41 | 97.6 | |
| 8 | | D. Akers | 2005 | 12 | 22 | 16 | 72.7 | 23 | 23 | 100.0 | |
| 9 | | D. Akers | 2006 | 16 | 23 | 18 | 78.3 | 48 | 48 | 100.0 | |
| 10 | | D. Akers | 2007 | 16 | 32 | 24 | 75.0 | 36 | 36 | 100.0 | |
| 11 | | D. Akers | 2008 | 16 | 40 | 33 | 82.5 | 45 | 45 | 100.0 | |
| 12 | | D. Akers | 2009 | 16 | 37 | 32 | 86.5 | 45 | 43 | 95.6 | |
| 13 | | D. Akers | 2010 | 16 | 38 | 32 | 84.2 | 47 | 47 | 100.0 | |
| 14 | | D. Akers | 2011 | 16 | 52 | 44 | 84.6 | 34 | 34 | 100.0 | |
| 15 | | D. Akers | 2012 | 16 | 42 | 29 | 69.0 | 44 | 44 | 100.0 | |
| 16 | | D. Akers | 2013 | 16 | 24 | 19 | 79.2 | 43 | 42 | 97.7 | |
| Average | 14.8 | 29.8 | 24.1 | 80.9 | 35.6 | 35.2 | 98.8 | ||||
| Total | 237 | 477 | 386 | 80.9 | 570 | 563 | 98.8 |
WASMore NFL News
Vita Vea agrees to a new deal with the Buccaneers, ending his hold-in
Colts' Keenan Allen and Falcons' Za'Darius Smith sit out the teams' first joint practice
Sanders to get opportunities in joint practice and preseason game as Browns QB competition continues
Cowboys' starting offensive tackles are trending in different directions during training camp
A fifth-round pick out of Arkansas barges into the Titans’ right guard battle
Ravens and Vikings give each other a valuable test on the first day of joint practice
NFL 2025 Leaders
NFL 2025 Rankings
NFL Fantasy 2025
NFL 2025 Betting
NFL 2025 Standings
| AFC East | W | L | T | PCT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Patriots - y | 14 | 3 | 0 | .824 |
 Bills - w | 12 | 5 | 0 | .706 |
 Dolphins - e | 7 | 10 | 0 | .412 |
 Jets - e | 3 | 14 | 0 | .176 |
| AFC North | W | L | T | PCT |
 Steelers - y | 10 | 7 | 0 | .588 |
 Ravens - e | 8 | 9 | 0 | .471 |
 Bengals - e | 6 | 11 | 0 | .353 |
 Browns - e | 5 | 12 | 0 | .294 |
| AFC South | W | L | T | PCT |
 Jaguars - y | 13 | 4 | 0 | .765 |
 Texans - w | 12 | 5 | 0 | .706 |
 Colts - e | 8 | 9 | 0 | .471 |
 Titans - e | 3 | 14 | 0 | .176 |
| AFC West | W | L | T | PCT |
 Broncos - z* | 14 | 3 | 0 | .824 |
 Chargers - w | 11 | 6 | 0 | .647 |
 Chiefs - e | 6 | 11 | 0 | .353 |
 Raiders - e | 3 | 14 | 0 | .176 |
| NFC East | W | L | T | PCT |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 Eagles - y | 11 | 6 | 0 | .647 |
 Cowboys - e | 7 | 9 | 1 | .441 |
 Commanders - e | 5 | 12 | 0 | .294 |
 Giants - e | 4 | 13 | 0 | .235 |
| NFC North | W | L | T | PCT |
 Bears - y | 11 | 6 | 0 | .647 |
 Packers - w | 9 | 7 | 1 | .559 |
 Vikings - e | 9 | 8 | 0 | .529 |
 Lions - e | 9 | 8 | 0 | .529 |
| NFC South | W | L | T | PCT |
 Panthers - y | 8 | 9 | 0 | .471 |
 Buccaneers - e | 8 | 9 | 0 | .471 |
 Falcons - e | 8 | 9 | 0 | .471 |
 Saints - e | 6 | 11 | 0 | .353 |
| NFC West | W | L | T | PCT |
 Seahawks - z* | 14 | 3 | 0 | .824 |
 Rams - w | 12 | 5 | 0 | .706 |
 49ers - w | 12 | 5 | 0 | .706 |
 Cardinals - e | 3 | 14 | 0 | .176 |