Natisha Hiedeman has a record of 12-16 versus Courtney Vandersloot or Courtney Williams in her career.
| NAME | DATE | REC | TM | OPP | W% | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | TS% | OREB | DREB | TOV | PF | +/- | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  | N. Hiedeman | 7/30/2019 | 1-0 | vs | 1.000 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 33.3 | 1 | 3 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 41.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -4 | |||
| 2 | | N. Hiedeman | 9/6/2019 | 0-1 | vs | .000 | 14 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 60.0 | 2 | 3 | 66.7 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 73.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | +8 | ||
| 3 | | N. Hiedeman | 8/8/2020 | 0-1 | vs | .000 | 20 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 25.0 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 37.5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -14 | |||
| 4 | | N. Hiedeman | 8/10/2020 | 1-0 | @ | 1.000 | 24 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 42.9 | 2 | 5 | 40.0 | 0 | 0 | 57.1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | -3 | |||
| 5 | | N. Hiedeman | 8/14/2020 | 1-0 | @ | 1.000 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | |||
| 6 | | N. Hiedeman | 9/11/2020 | 0-1 | vs | .000 | 28 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 50.0 | 3 | 5 | 60.0 | 2 | 3 | 66.7 | 69.7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -6 | ||
| 7 | | N. Hiedeman | 5/14/2021 | 1-0 | @ | 1.000 | 29 | 9 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 33.3 | 2 | 6 | 33.3 | 3 | 5 | 60.0 | 54.9 | 1 | 7 | 3 | 3 | +15 | ||
| 8 | | N. Hiedeman | 6/17/2021 | 0-1 | @ | .000 | 15 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 83.3 | 1 | 1 | 100.0 | 2 | 2 | 100.0 | 94.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 9 | | N. Hiedeman | 6/19/2021 | 0-1 | @ | .000 | 12 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100.0 | 1 | 1 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 150.0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | -4 | |||
| 10 | | N. Hiedeman | 6/27/2021 | 1-0 | vs | 1.000 | 17 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 16.7 | 1 | 4 | 25.0 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 29.1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | +1 | ||
| 11 | | N. Hiedeman | 7/9/2021 | 1-0 | vs | 1.000 | 17 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 0 | 3 | 0.0 | 2 | 4 | 50.0 | 21.0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | -4 | ||
| 12 | | N. Hiedeman | 9/19/2021 | 1-0 | vs | 1.000 | 22 | 16 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 50.0 | 3 | 6 | 50.0 | 5 | 5 | 100.0 | 78.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +9 | ||
| 13 | | N. Hiedeman | 6/10/2022 | 0-1 | vs | .000 | 23 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 57.1 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 1 | 2 | 50.0 | 57.1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | -6 | ||
| 14 | | N. Hiedeman | 6/29/2022 | 0-1 | @ | .000 | 34 | 4 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 40.0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 40.0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | -4 | |||
| 15 | | N. Hiedeman | 7/31/2022 | 0-1 | vs | .000 | 30 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 22.2 | 1 | 4 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 27.8 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | -7 | |||
| 16 | | N. Hiedeman | 8/7/2022 | 0-1 | @ | .000 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | -10 | |||
| 17 | | N. Hiedeman | 5/27/2023 | 0-1 | @ | .000 | 33 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 23.1 | 2 | 7 | 28.6 | 0 | 0 | 30.8 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | -8 | |||
| 18 | | N. Hiedeman | 6/25/2023 | 1-0 | vs | 1.000 | 29 | 14 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 12 | 41.7 | 2 | 5 | 40.0 | 2 | 2 | 100.0 | 54.3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | +22 | ||
| 19 | | N. Hiedeman | 6/27/2023 | 0-1 | vs | .000 | 15 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 37.5 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 37.5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 2 | -16 | |||
| 20 | | N. Hiedeman | 7/12/2023 | 1-0 | @ | 1.000 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +1 | |||
| 21 | | N. Hiedeman | 8/20/2023 | 1-0 | @ | 1.000 | 33 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 | 71.4 | 2 | 3 | 66.7 | 1 | 1 | 100.0 | 87.4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | +8 | ||
| 22 | | N. Hiedeman | 8/24/2023 | 0-1 | vs | .000 | 34 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 18.2 | 1 | 7 | 14.3 | 2 | 2 | 100.0 | 29.5 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 4 | -10 | ||
| 23 | | N. Hiedeman | 9/1/2023 | 0-1 | @ | .000 | 30 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 16.7 | 1 | 3 | 33.3 | 0 | 0 | 25.0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | -17 | |||
| 24 | | N. Hiedeman | 9/10/2023 | 0-1 | vs | .000 | 27 | 13 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 50.0 | 3 | 6 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | 65.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -14 | |||
| 25 |  | N. Hiedeman | 5/25/2024 | 1-0 | vs | 1.000 | 18 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 28.6 | 1 | 4 | 25.0 | 0 | 0 | 35.7 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | +15 | |||
| Average | .429 | 21.2 | 6.9 | 2.4 | 2.9 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 6.5 | 36.6 | 1.2 | 3.6 | 34.0 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 75.0 | 48.7 | 0.4 | 2.0 | 1.2 | 1.9 | -2.2 | |||||||
| Total | 12-16 | .429 | 595 | 192 | 66 | 80 | 18 | 4 | 67 | 183 | 36.6 | 34 | 100 | 34.0 | 24 | 32 | 75.0 | 48.7 | 10 | 56 | 33 | 53 | -61 | ||||||
CON
CHI
ATL
CON
NYL
MINStatMuse has game-level data for record going back to the 1997 season.
More WNBA News
A’ja Wilson scores 32 points, Chelsea Gray ties WNBA record with 9 3-pointers, Aces beat Fire 105-89
Boston and Clark power Fever past Sky 114-106 in overtime
Paige Bueckers scores season-high 31 and the Wings beat the Mercury 85-70
Breanna Stewart's double-double, Satou Sabally's 5 3-pointers help Liberty beat Dream 104-90
Boston, Clark are 1st WNBA teammates with 30-point double-doubles as Fever top Sky 114-106 in OT
Young Mystics have shown they can compete, but they can still expect more growing pains
More Sun Stats
Team Leaders 
PPG
12.8
Griner
RPG
10.9
Morrow
APG
4.8
Lacan
Team Rankings
ORTG
96.2
15th
DRTG
110.2
12th
NETRTG
-14.0
15th
3P%
26.6
15th
Fever
Tempo
Mystics
WNBA 2026 Leaders
WNBA 2026 Rankings
WNBA Fantasy 2026
WNBA 2026 Betting
WNBA 2026 Standings
| Team | W | L | PCT | GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | 2 | .833 | ||
| 2 | 9 | 3 | .750 | 1.0 | |
| 3 | 9 | 4 | .692 | 1.5 | |
| 4 | 8 | 4 | .667 | 2.0 | |
| 5 | 8 | 4 | .667 | 2.0 | |
| 6 | 7 | 5 | .583 | 3.0 | |
| 7 | 7 | 5 | .583 | 3.0 | |
| 8 | 7 | 5 | .583 | 3.0 | |
| 9 | 6 | 6 | .500 | 4.0 | |
| 10 | 6 | 8 | .429 | 5.0 | |
| 11 | 4 | 6 | .400 | 5.0 | |
| 12 | 4 | 9 | .308 | 6.5 | |
| 13 | 4 | 10 | .286 | 7.0 | |
| 14 | 3 | 11 | .214 | 8.0 | |
| 15 | 2 | 12 | .143 | 9.0 |
Aces
Wings
Valkyries
Sparks
Fire
Mercury
Storm