| TEAM | DATE | REC | TM | OPP | RESULT | W% | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | TS% | OREB | DREB | TOV | PF | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mercury | 6/21/1999 | 0-1 | @ | L 76-80 | .000 | 200 | 76 | 40 | 20 | 3 | 6 | 26 | 79 | 32.9 | 10 | 29 | 34.5 | 14 | 20 | 70.0 | 43.3 | 19 | 21 | 12 | 29 | |||
| 2 | Mercury | 7/23/1999 | 1-0 | vs | W 73-67 | 1.000 | 200 | 73 | 30 | 16 | 10 | 4 | 22 | 50 | 44.0 | 3 | 11 | 27.3 | 26 | 30 | 86.7 | 57.8 | 9 | 21 | 19 | 15 | |||
| 3 | Mercury | 8/1/2000 | 1-0 | vs | W 84-77 | 1.000 | 200 | 84 | 33 | 17 | 5 | 6 | 29 | 51 | 56.9 | 5 | 10 | 50.0 | 21 | 31 | 67.7 | 65.0 | 9 | 24 | 14 | 16 | |||
| 4 | Mercury | 6/16/2001 | 1-0 | vs | W 72-68 | 1.000 | 200 | 72 | 23 | 21 | 13 | 1 | 29 | 56 | 51.8 | 6 | 13 | 46.2 | 8 | 13 | 61.5 | 58.3 | 5 | 18 | 19 | 18 | |||
| 5 | Mercury | 8/5/2001 | 0-1 | @ | L 69-78 | .000 | 200 | 69 | 24 | 19 | 9 | 3 | 27 | 55 | 49.1 | 3 | 7 | 42.9 | 12 | 15 | 80.0 | 56.0 | 5 | 19 | 21 | 23 | |||
| 6 | Mercury | 7/6/2002 | 0-1 | @ | L 70-72 | .000 | 200 | 70 | 22 | 16 | 10 | 1 | 27 | 57 | 47.4 | 4 | 14 | 28.6 | 12 | 16 | 75.0 | 54.7 | 6 | 16 | 15 | 25 | |||
| 7 | Mercury | 7/19/2003 | 0-1 | vs | L 67-75 | .000 | 200 | 67 | 25 | 13 | 9 | 2 | 25 | 58 | 43.1 | 4 | 10 | 40.0 | 13 | 19 | 68.4 | 50.5 | 14 | 11 | 16 | 22 | |||
| 8 | Mercury | 5/22/2004 | 1-0 | @ | W 65-58 | 1.000 | 200 | 65 | 30 | 13 | 10 | 3 | 22 | 51 | 43.1 | 6 | 12 | 50.0 | 15 | 18 | 83.3 | 55.2 | 1 | 29 | 14 | 18 | |||
| 9 | Mercury | 6/9/2004 | 1-0 | vs | W 75-59 | 1.000 | 200 | 75 | 26 | 19 | 6 | 3 | 31 | 59 | 52.5 | 3 | 9 | 33.3 | 10 | 12 | 83.3 | 58.3 | 11 | 15 | 13 | 18 | |||
| 10 | Mercury | 5/28/2005 | 0-1 | @ | L 68-85 | .000 | 200 | 68 | 31 | 13 | 9 | 2 | 24 | 65 | 36.9 | 6 | 15 | 40.0 | 14 | 22 | 63.6 | 45.5 | 11 | 20 | 17 | 24 | |||
| 11 | Mercury | 6/25/2005 | 0-1 | vs | L 69-77 | .000 | 200 | 69 | 27 | 15 | 3 | 6 | 25 | 62 | 40.3 | 6 | 21 | 28.6 | 13 | 19 | 68.4 | 49.0 | 6 | 21 | 8 | 31 | |||
| 12 | Mercury | 6/16/2006 | 1-0 | vs | W 91-86 | 1.000 | 200 | 91 | 43 | 17 | 6 | 4 | 30 | 66 | 45.5 | 6 | 12 | 50.0 | 25 | 37 | 67.6 | 55.3 | 13 | 30 | 11 | 19 | |||
| 13 | Mercury | 7/8/2006 | 0-1 | @ | L 77-82 | .000 | 200 | 77 | 40 | 22 | 10 | 4 | 31 | 75 | 41.3 | 5 | 17 | 29.4 | 10 | 15 | 66.7 | 47.2 | 15 | 25 | 12 | 22 | |||
| 14 | Mercury | 6/2/2007 | 0-1 | @ | L 67-76 | .000 | 200 | 67 | 38 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 25 | 69 | 36.2 | 6 | 22 | 27.3 | 11 | 17 | 64.7 | 43.8 | 12 | 26 | 12 | 16 | |||
| 15 | Mercury | 7/6/2007 | 1-0 | vs | W 111-109 | 1.000 | 250 | 111 | 38 | 17 | 14 | 5 | 43 | 96 | 44.8 | 8 | 25 | 32.0 | 17 | 22 | 77.3 | 52.5 | 11 | 27 | 15 | 25 | |||
| 16 | Mercury | 6/18/2008 | 1-0 | vs | W 102-81 | 1.000 | 200 | 102 | 39 | 21 | 11 | 2 | 37 | 72 | 51.4 | 6 | 18 | 33.3 | 22 | 23 | 95.7 | 62.1 | 12 | 27 | 18 | 22 | |||
| 17 | Mercury | 6/29/2008 | 1-0 | @ | W 87-80 | 1.000 | 200 | 87 | 45 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 32 | 73 | 43.8 | 9 | 23 | 39.1 | 14 | 19 | 73.7 | 53.5 | 14 | 31 | 14 | 22 | |||
| 18 | Mercury | 7/28/2009 | 1-0 | @ | W 95-80 | 1.000 | 200 | 95 | 44 | 18 | 3 | 6 | 35 | 69 | 50.7 | 7 | 19 | 36.8 | 18 | 21 | 85.7 | 60.7 | 8 | 36 | 15 | 21 | |||
| 19 | Mercury | 8/29/2009 | 1-0 | vs | W 95-84 | 1.000 | 200 | 95 | 43 | 15 | 7 | 4 | 29 | 72 | 40.3 | 4 | 16 | 25.0 | 33 | 40 | 82.5 | 53.0 | 8 | 35 | 13 | 20 | |||
| 20 | Mercury | 6/20/2010 | 0-1 | vs | L 94-96 | .000 | 200 | 94 | 38 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 32 | 71 | 45.1 | 6 | 20 | 30.0 | 24 | 29 | 82.8 | 56.1 | 7 | 31 | 8 | 17 | |||
| 21 | Mercury | 6/25/2010 | 0-1 | @ | L 79-82 | .000 | 200 | 79 | 39 | 19 | 3 | 3 | 25 | 66 | 37.9 | 5 | 23 | 21.7 | 24 | 28 | 85.7 | 50.4 | 5 | 34 | 14 | 24 | |||
| 22 | Mercury | 8/7/2011 | 0-1 | vs | L 95-96 | .000 | 225 | 95 | 49 | 19 | 9 | 5 | 34 | 89 | 38.2 | 12 | 33 | 36.4 | 15 | 18 | 83.3 | 49.0 | 18 | 31 | 14 | 16 | |||
| 23 | Mercury | 8/26/2011 | 0-1 | @ | L 92-95 | .000 | 200 | 92 | 36 | 25 | 6 | 1 | 36 | 73 | 49.3 | 10 | 25 | 40.0 | 10 | 10 | 100.0 | 59.4 | 7 | 29 | 14 | 25 | |||
| 24 | Mercury | 9/7/2012 | 1-0 | @ | W 91-82 | 1.000 | 200 | 91 | 45 | 18 | 6 | 2 | 32 | 73 | 43.8 | 11 | 28 | 39.3 | 16 | 20 | 80.0 | 55.6 | 16 | 29 | 16 | 23 | |||
| 25 | Mercury | 9/12/2012 | 0-1 | vs | L 78-100 | .000 | 200 | 78 | 38 | 12 | 6 | 5 | 26 | 64 | 40.6 | 5 | 16 | 31.3 | 21 | 29 | 72.4 | 50.8 | 13 | 25 | 16 | 21 | |||
| Average | .446 | 216.5 | 80.0 | 33.6 | 17.6 | 6.9 | 4.2 | 28.6 | 65.5 | 43.7 | 6.2 | 19.5 | 31.7 | 16.6 | 20.7 | 80.3 | 53.6 | 8.5 | 25.1 | 14.6 | 19.8 | ||||||||
| Total | 29-36 | .446 | 14,070 | 5,200 | 2,187 | 1,146 | 447 | 273 | 1,858 | 4,255 | 43.7 | 403 | 1,270 | 31.7 | 1,081 | 1,346 | 80.3 | 53.6 | 554 | 1,633 | 946 | 1,289 | |||||||
StatMuse has team, game-level data for record going back to the 1997 season.
More WNBA News
Caitlin Clark’s whirlwind All-Star weekend: Meeting Obama, then lighting up the game
An emotional Jonquel Jones wins WNBA All-Star MVP, dedicates honor to late aunt
Jones and Clark help Team Spoon beat Team Coop 129-122 in the WNBA All-Star Game
WNBA All-Star Game MVPs
WNBA to add an NBA-style replay center next season in a major officiating investment
Scrutiny of WNBA intensifies as mounting discord around the league looms over All-Star festivities
More Mercury Stats
Team Leaders
PPG
20.5
Copper
RPG
7.9
Mack
APG
8.3
Thomas
Team Rankings
ORTG
104.1
12th
DRTG
108.6
12th
NETRTG
-4.5
10th
3P%
32.2
10th
WNBA 2026 Leaders
WNBA 2026 Rankings
WNBA Fantasy 2026
WNBA 2026 Betting
WNBA 2026 Standings
| Team | W | L | PCT | GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | 6 | .786 | ||
| 2 | 19 | 8 | .704 | 2.5 | |
| 3 | 18 | 8 | .692 | 3.0 | |
| 4 | 18 | 9 | .667 | 3.5 | |
| 5 | 17 | 10 | .630 | 4.5 | |
| 6 | 16 | 10 | .615 | 5.0 | |
| 7 | 15 | 12 | .556 | 6.5 | |
| 8 | 14 | 12 | .538 | 7.0 | |
| 9 | 11 | 16 | .407 | 10.5 | |
| 10 | 10 | 16 | .385 | 11.0 | |
| 11 | 10 | 16 | .385 | 11.0 | |
| 12 | 10 | 18 | .357 | 12.0 | |
| 13 | 9 | 18 | .333 | 12.5 | |
| 14 | 7 | 20 | .259 | 14.5 | |
| 15 | 6 | 23 | .207 | 16.5 |
