The Phoenix Mercury had their highest point differential in a win against the Wings on May 27, 2017, with a 42 point differential.
Interpreted as:
phoenix mercury biggest win in a regular-season game of margin| TEAM | DIFF | DATE | TM | OPP | RESULT | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | TS% | OREB | DREB | TOV | PF | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  | Mercury | 42 | 5/27/2017 | vs | W 107-65 | 240 | 107 | 41 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 36 | 74 | 48.6 | 12 | 25 | 48.0 | 23 | 29 | 79.3 | 61.7 | 9 | 32 | 9 | 24 | ||
| 2 | | Mercury | 39 | 7/10/2011 | vs | W 102-63 | 200 | 102 | 33 | 23 | 8 | 6 | 37 | 62 | 59.7 | 8 | 12 | 66.7 | 20 | 28 | 71.4 | 68.6 | 9 | 24 | 20 | 16 | ||
| 3 | | Mercury | 35 | 8/7/2025 | vs | W 95-60 | 200 | 95 | 44 | 25 | 9 | 0 | 34 | 77 | 44.2 | 10 | 29 | 34.5 | 17 | 18 | 94.4 | 55.9 | 13 | 31 | 15 | 15 | ||
| 4 |  | Mercury | 34 | 8/19/2005 | vs | W 91-57 | 200 | 91 | 37 | 22 | 9 | 9 | 27 | 63 | 42.9 | 12 | 31 | 38.7 | 25 | 30 | 83.3 | 59.7 | 14 | 23 | 6 | 16 | ||
| 5 |  | Mercury | 33 | 5/9/2026 | @ | W 99-66 | 200 | 99 | 37 | 23 | 11 | 4 | 38 | 77 | 49.4 | 11 | 24 | 45.8 | 12 | 15 | 80.0 | 59.2 | 7 | 30 | 8 | 10 | ||
| 6 | | Mercury | 33 | 6/22/2000 | @ | W 90-57 | 200 | 90 | 40 | 18 | 14 | 2 | 33 | 66 | 50.0 | 3 | 16 | 18.8 | 21 | 24 | 87.5 | 58.8 | 16 | 24 | 11 | 18 | ||
| 7 | | Mercury | 33 | 6/7/2000 | vs | W 82-49 | 200 | 82 | 35 | 16 | 9 | 3 | 32 | 59 | 54.2 | 4 | 14 | 28.6 | 14 | 16 | 87.5 | 62.1 | 8 | 27 | 9 | 21 | ||
| 8 | | Mercury | 33 | 7/29/1999 | vs | W 79-46 | 200 | 79 | 33 | 25 | 16 | 2 | 31 | 60 | 51.7 | 4 | 13 | 30.8 | 13 | 18 | 72.2 | 58.2 | 10 | 23 | 13 | 10 | ||
| 9 | | Mercury | 33 | 6/26/1998 | vs | W 96-63 | 200 | 96 | 33 | 27 | 12 | 1 | 34 | 71 | 47.9 | 6 | 15 | 40.0 | 22 | 29 | 75.9 | 57.3 | 11 | 22 | 12 | 13 | ||
| 10 | | Mercury | 32 | 8/29/2026 | vs | W 101-69 | 200 | 101 | 35 | 27 | 12 | 3 | 37 | 77 | 48.1 | 15 | 34 | 44.1 | 12 | 13 | 92.3 | 61.0 | 10 | 25 | 9 | 19 | ||
| 11 | | Mercury | 32 | 7/22/2010 | @ | W 123-91 | 200 | 123 | 40 | 30 | 12 | 8 | 46 | 81 | 56.8 | 10 | 20 | 50.0 | 21 | 22 | 95.5 | 67.8 | 10 | 30 | 16 | 24 | ||
| 12 | | Mercury | 32 | 6/12/2010 | vs | W 116-84 | 200 | 116 | 42 | 29 | 8 | 4 | 43 | 81 | 53.1 | 11 | 31 | 35.5 | 19 | 24 | 79.2 | 63.3 | 8 | 34 | 9 | 17 | ||
| 13 | | Mercury | 32 | 7/21/2004 | vs | W 87-55 | 200 | 87 | 40 | 18 | 8 | 3 | 36 | 67 | 53.7 | 5 | 12 | 41.7 | 10 | 11 | 90.9 | 60.6 | 11 | 29 | 8 | 15 | ||
| 14 | | Mercury | 32 | 8/6/1997 | vs | W 78-46 | 200 | 78 | 42 | 21 | 14 | 6 | 28 | 64 | 43.8 | 5 | 16 | 31.3 | 17 | 22 | 77.3 | 52.9 | 13 | 29 | 19 | 16 | ||
| 15 | | Mercury | 31 | 7/2/2015 | vs | W 86-55 | 240 | 86 | 33 | 21 | 8 | 10 | 35 | 63 | 55.6 | 7 | 18 | 38.9 | 9 | 10 | 90.0 | 63.8 | 3 | 30 | 13 | 25 | ||
| 16 | | Mercury | 31 | 8/8/2006 | vs | W 99-68 | 200 | 99 | 46 | 28 | 11 | 5 | 37 | 76 | 48.7 | 9 | 28 | 32.1 | 16 | 18 | 88.9 | 59.0 | 10 | 36 | 8 | 17 | ||
| 17 | | Mercury | 30 | 7/7/2025 | vs | W 102-72 | 200 | 102 | 43 | 29 | 9 | 5 | 36 | 76 | 47.4 | 14 | 32 | 43.8 | 16 | 25 | 64.0 | 58.6 | 11 | 32 | 11 | 15 | ||
| 18 | | Mercury | 30 | 9/5/2015 | @ | W 82-52 | 240 | 82 | 38 | 23 | 9 | 7 | 32 | 62 | 51.6 | 4 | 12 | 33.3 | 14 | 20 | 70.0 | 57.9 | 6 | 32 | 14 | 19 | ||
| 19 | | Mercury | 29 | 8/2/2020 | @ | W 96-67 | 240 | 96 | 47 | 20 | 8 | 9 | 32 | 66 | 48.5 | 5 | 19 | 26.3 | 27 | 33 | 81.8 | 59.6 | 9 | 38 | 13 | 29 | ||
| 20 | | Mercury | 29 | 7/13/2014 | vs | W 90-61 | 200 | 90 | 34 | 23 | 12 | 2 | 33 | 61 | 54.1 | 8 | 17 | 47.1 | 16 | 18 | 88.9 | 65.3 | 5 | 29 | 13 | 16 | ||
| 21 | | Mercury | 29 | 8/4/1998 | vs | W 88-59 | 200 | 88 | 43 | 22 | 15 | 7 | 29 | 68 | 42.6 | 1 | 10 | 10.0 | 29 | 42 | 69.0 | 50.9 | 18 | 25 | 14 | 15 | ||
| 22 | | Mercury | 28 | 8/3/2006 | vs | W 112-84 | 200 | 112 | 33 | 24 | 11 | 1 | 42 | 68 | 61.8 | 9 | 12 | 75.0 | 19 | 25 | 76.0 | 70.9 | 8 | 25 | 15 | 20 | ||
| 23 | | Mercury | 27 | 8/25/2021 | @ | W 106-79 | 240 | 106 | 40 | 26 | 4 | 4 | 43 | 76 | 56.6 | 12 | 25 | 48.0 | 8 | 9 | 88.9 | 66.3 | 7 | 33 | 8 | 12 | ||
| 24 | | Mercury | 27 | 8/22/2003 | vs | W 89-62 | 200 | 89 | 34 | 16 | 16 | 6 | 28 | 59 | 47.5 | 4 | 9 | 44.4 | 29 | 47 | 61.7 | 55.8 | 13 | 21 | 13 | 28 | ||
| 25 | | Mercury | 26 | 8/26/2016 | vs | W 98-72 | 240 | 98 | 39 | 16 | 5 | 7 | 36 | 63 | 57.1 | 7 | 11 | 63.6 | 19 | 21 | 90.5 | 67.8 | 6 | 33 | 11 | 22 | ||
PHX
TUL
PHX
SAN
CHA
SEA
MIN
UTA
SAN
WAS
CHAStatMuse has team, game-level data for point differential going back to the 1997 season.
More WNBA News
AP WNBA Power Poll
New York Liberty lead the WNBA with 7 players headed to the FIBA World Cup
US stars A'ja Wilson and Kelsey Plum to miss the FIBA Women's World Cup
Shepard has 22nd double-double this season, Wings beat Sun 97-71
Tiffany Hayes scores 18, Kayla Thornton 17 for Valkyries in 86-69 win over Fire
Ogwumike, Burrell lead Sparks past Storm 90-74
More Mercury Stats
Team Leaders 
PPG
21.3
Copper
RPG
7.7
Thomas
APG
8.4
Thomas
Team Rankings
ORTG
105.3
11th
DRTG
109.1
10th
NETRTG
-3.8
10th
3P%
32.7
10th
WNBA 2026 Leaders
WNBA 2026 Rankings
WNBA Fantasy 2026
WNBA 2026 Betting
WNBA 2026 Standings
| Team | W | L | PCT | GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Lynx - x | 31 | 9 | .775 | |
| 2 |  Valkyries - x | 29 | 11 | .725 | 2.0 |
| 3 |  Aces - x | 27 | 13 | .675 | 4.0 |
| 4 |  Dream - x | 26 | 14 | .650 | 5.0 |
| 5 |  Fever - x | 26 | 14 | .650 | 5.0 |
| 6 |  Liberty - x | 24 | 16 | .600 | 7.0 |
| 7 |  Mystics - x | 24 | 16 | .600 | 7.0 |
| 8 |  Wings - x | 24 | 16 | .600 | 7.0 |
| 9 |  Fire - e | 16 | 24 | .400 | 15.0 |
| 10 |  Sky - e | 15 | 25 | .375 | 16.0 |
| 11 |  Sparks - e | 15 | 25 | .375 | 16.0 |
| 12 |  Mercury - e | 14 | 26 | .350 | 17.0 |
| 13 |  Tempo - e | 11 | 29 | .275 | 20.0 |
| 14 |  Sun - e | 10 | 30 | .250 | 21.0 |
| 15 |  Storm - e | 8 | 32 | .200 | 23.0 |