Interpreted as:
Julius Randle usage rate in his career| NAME | SEASON | TM | GP | USG% | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | TPG | FGM | FGA | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TOV | PF | +/- | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Julius Randle | 2014-15 |  LAL | 1 | 15.4 | 14.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -18 | |
| Julius Randle | 2015-16 | LAL | 81 | 21.2 | 28.2 | 11.3 | 10.2 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 4.4 | 10.3 | 42.9 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 27.8 | 2.4 | 3.3 | 71.5 | 2,286 | 919 | 829 | 144 | 53 | 29 | 149 | 242 | -681 |
| Julius Randle | 2016-17 | LAL | 74 | 21.4 | 28.8 | 13.2 | 8.6 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 5.1 | 10.4 | 48.8 | 0.2 | 0.9 | 27.0 | 2.8 | 3.8 | 72.3 | 2,132 | 975 | 636 | 264 | 49 | 37 | 173 | 248 | -453 |
| Julius Randle | 2017-18 | LAL | 82 | 25.1 | 26.7 | 16.1 | 8.0 | 2.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.6 | 6.1 | 11.0 | 55.8 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 22.2 | 3.7 | 5.2 | 71.8 | 2,190 | 1,323 | 654 | 210 | 43 | 45 | 213 | 274 | -80 |
 | Julius Randle | 2018-19 |  NOP | 73 | 27.7 | 30.6 | 21.4 | 8.7 | 3.1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 2.8 | 7.8 | 14.9 | 52.4 | 0.9 | 2.7 | 34.4 | 4.9 | 6.7 | 73.1 | 2,232 | 1,565 | 634 | 229 | 52 | 45 | 208 | 246 | -12 |
 | Julius Randle | 2019-20 |  NYK | 64 | 27.6 | 32.5 | 19.5 | 9.7 | 3.1 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 3.0 | 7.2 | 15.7 | 46.0 | 1.0 | 3.6 | 27.7 | 4.0 | 5.5 | 73.3 | 2,080 | 1,248 | 622 | 198 | 51 | 22 | 193 | 178 | -244 |
| Julius Randle | 2020-21 | NYK | 71 | 29.2 | 37.6 | 24.1 | 10.2 | 6.0 | 0.9 | 0.3 | 3.4 | 8.5 | 18.6 | 45.6 | 2.3 | 5.5 | 41.1 | 4.9 | 6.0 | 81.1 | 2,667 | 1,712 | 724 | 427 | 64 | 18 | 241 | 225 | +153 |
| Julius Randle | 2021-22 | NYK | 72 | 28.7 | 35.3 | 20.1 | 9.9 | 5.1 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 3.4 | 7.1 | 17.3 | 41.1 | 1.7 | 5.4 | 30.8 | 4.2 | 5.6 | 75.6 | 2,544 | 1,447 | 716 | 370 | 53 | 39 | 245 | 205 | -164 |
| Julius Randle | 2022-23 | NYK | 77 | 29.4 | 35.5 | 25.1 | 10.0 | 4.1 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 2.8 | 8.5 | 18.6 | 45.9 | 2.8 | 8.3 | 34.3 | 5.2 | 6.9 | 75.7 | 2,737 | 1,936 | 767 | 316 | 49 | 21 | 216 | 233 | +171 |
| Total | 26.5 | 31.7 | 18.7 | 9.4 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 2.8 | 6.8 | 14.5 | 47.0 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 33.6 | 4.0 | 5.3 | 74.5 | 18,882 | 11,127 | 5,582 | 2,158 | 414 | 256 | 1,639 | 1,852 | -1328 | ||||
| Average | 26.5 | 31.7 | 18.7 | 9.4 | 3.6 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 2.8 | 6.8 | 14.5 | 47.0 | 1.1 | 3.3 | 33.6 | 4.0 | 5.3 | 74.5 | 2098.0 | 1236.3 | 620.2 | 239.8 | 46.0 | 28.4 | 182.1 | 205.8 | -147.6 |
StatMuse has season-level data for usage percentage going back to the 1977-78 season.