Joe Fulks has the most shot attempts in a game with exactly 0 assists, with 56 attempts versus the Indianapolis Jets on February 10, 1949.
Interpreted as:
most fga by a player in a regular-season game with 0 assists| NAME | FGA | AST | DATE | TM | OPP | MIN | PTS | REB | STL | BLK | FGM | FG% | 3PM | 3PA | 3P% | FTM | FTA | FT% | TS% | OREB | DREB | TOV | PF | +/- | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  | J. Fulks | 56 | 0 | 2/10/1949 | vs | 63 | 27 | 48.2 | 9 | 14 | 64.3 | 50.7 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| 2 |  | W. Chamberlain | 51 | 0 | 11/18/1962 | @ | 48 | 59 | 17 | 24 | 47.1 | 11 | 16 | 68.8 | 50.8 | 2 | |||||||||||
| 3 | | W. Chamberlain | 48 | 0 | 1/13/1962 | vs | 48 | 73 | 36 | 29 | 60.4 | 15 | 25 | 60.0 | 61.9 | 2 | |||||||||||
| 4 | | W. Chamberlain | 48 | 0 | 12/9/1961 | vs | 48 | 61 | 36 | 28 | 58.3 | 5 | 10 | 50.0 | 58.2 | 3 | |||||||||||
| 5 | | W. Chamberlain | 48 | 0 | 11/4/1961 | vs | 48 | 58 | 33 | 24 | 50.0 | 10 | 16 | 62.5 | 52.7 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 6 | | W. Chamberlain | 47 | 0 | 12/20/1961 | @ | 48 | 55 | 19 | 24 | 51.1 | 7 | 11 | 63.6 | 53.0 | 0 | |||||||||||
| 7 | | W. Chamberlain | 47 | 0 | 11/19/1961 | @ | 48 | 51 | 16 | 24 | 51.1 | 3 | 8 | 37.5 | 50.5 | 2 | |||||||||||
| 8 | | W. Chamberlain | 46 | 0 | 1/21/1961 | vs | 48 | 56 | 45 | 25 | 54.3 | 6 | 13 | 46.2 | 54.1 | 2 | |||||||||||
| 9 | | W. Chamberlain | 44 | 0 | 1/29/1963 | @ | 48 | 62 | 12 | 27 | 61.4 | 8 | 17 | 47.1 | 60.2 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 10 | | W. Chamberlain | 44 | 0 | 12/25/1961 | @ | 58 | 59 | 36 | 23 | 52.3 | 13 | 22 | 59.1 | 55.0 | 3 | |||||||||||
| 11 |  | C. Russell | 43 | 0 | 12/11/1973 | vs | 41 | 49 | 6 | 0 | 22 | 51.2 | 5 | 6 | 83.3 | 53.7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | ||||||||
| 12 | | W. Chamberlain | 43 | 0 | 2/23/1963 | @ | 46 | 34 | 22 | 14 | 32.6 | 6 | 9 | 66.7 | 36.2 | 3 | |||||||||||
| 13 | | W. Chamberlain | 43 | 0 | 12/13/1961 | @ | 48 | 52 | 30 | 22 | 51.2 | 8 | 12 | 66.7 | 53.9 | 2 | |||||||||||
| 14 | | W. Chamberlain | 42 | 0 | 1/4/1963 | @ | 48 | 45 | 26 | 19 | 45.2 | 7 | 14 | 50.0 | 46.7 | 2 | |||||||||||
| 15 |  | E. Hayes | 41 | 0 | 10/27/1970 | @ | 46 | 34 | 21 | 15 | 36.6 | 4 | 9 | 44.4 | 37.8 | 5 | |||||||||||
| 16 | | W. Chamberlain | 41 | 0 | 1/30/1963 | @ | 48 | 50 | 17 | 20 | 48.8 | 10 | 14 | 71.4 | 53.0 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 17 | | J. Fulks | 41 | 0 | 2/22/1949 | @ | 21 | 8 | 19.5 | 5 | 6 | 83.3 | 24.1 | 3 | |||||||||||||
| 18 | | E. Hayes | 40 | 0 | 2/8/1969 | @ | 53 | 28 | 24 | 13 | 32.5 | 2 | 4 | 50.0 | 33.5 | 4 | |||||||||||
| 19 |  | W. Chamberlain | 40 | 0 | 12/8/1965 | @ | 48 | 46 | 21 | 19 | 47.5 | 8 | 12 | 66.7 | 50.8 | 3 | |||||||||||
| 20 | | W. Chamberlain | 40 | 0 | 11/4/1959 | vs | 47 | 41 | 40 | 17 | 42.5 | 7 | 15 | 46.7 | 44.0 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 21 | | J. Fulks | 40 | 0 | 11/27/1947 | vs | 24 | 7 | 17.5 | 10 | 13 | 76.9 | 26.2 | 5 | |||||||||||||
| 22 |  | B. Rule | 39 | 0 | 11/21/1969 | vs | 45 | 35 | 11 | 16 | 41.0 | 3 | 7 | 42.9 | 41.6 | 3 | |||||||||||
| 23 | | W. Chamberlain | 39 | 0 | 11/22/1964 | vs | 48 | 50 | 40 | 21 | 53.8 | 8 | 21 | 38.1 | 51.8 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 24 | | W. Chamberlain | 39 | 0 | 3/4/1960 | 53 | 42 | 22 | 19 | 48.7 | 4 | 8 | 50.0 | 49.4 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| 25 |  | B. Love | 38 | 0 | 11/14/1975 | @ | 45 | 39 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 44.7 | 5 | 6 | 83.3 | 48.0 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||||||
PHI
SFW
CIN
CHI
DET
GSW
HOU
CHI
SDR
MIL
ROC
PHI
BAL
SYR
SEA
PORResults may be incomplete. StatMuse has complete game-level data for assists and field-goal attempts going back to the 1982-83 season.
More NBA News
Star power: Viewership for Game 1 of NBA Finals up 90% over last year's series opener
Paul Westhead, champion coach in NBA and WNBA, receives NBCA's Chuck Daly Lifetime Achievement Award
Game 2: Knicks looking to take command of NBA Finals, Spurs hoping to tie the title series
The superfans known as the 'Spurs Nuns' aiming to bring divine intervention to the NBA Finals
Towns more than held his own against Wembanyama, and Knicks looking for more in Game 2 of finals
Spurs know they have to be better in Game 2 of the NBA Finals, and Knicks feel the same way
More Warriors Stats
Team Leaders 
PPG
26.6
Curry
RPG
5.5
Green
APG
5.5
Green
Team Rankings
ORTG
115.0
18th
DRTG
115.6
17th
NETRTG
-0.6
20th
3P%
35.6
20th
2025-26 Conference Standings
| TEAM | W | L | PCT | GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 | 42 | 40 | .512 | 22.0 | |
9 | 42 | 40 | .512 | 22.0 | |
10 |  Warriors | 37 | 45 | .451 | 27.0 |
11 | 26 | 56 | .317 | 38.0 | |
12 | 26 | 56 | .317 | 38.0 |
Clippers
NBA 2025-26 Leaders
NBA 2025-26 Rankings
NBA Fantasy 2025-26
NBA 2025-26 Betting
NBA 2025-26 Standings
| Eastern | W | L | PCT | GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Pistons - z | 60 | 22 | .732 | |
| 2 |  Celtics - x | 56 | 26 | .683 | 4.0 |
| 3 |  Knicks - x | 53 | 29 | .646 | 7.0 |
| 4 |  Cavaliers - x | 52 | 30 | .634 | 8.0 |
| 5 |  Raptors - x | 46 | 36 | .561 | 14.0 |
| 6 |  Hawks - x | 46 | 36 | .561 | 14.0 |
| 7 |  76ers - x | 45 | 37 | .549 | 15.0 |
| 8 |  Magic - x | 45 | 37 | .549 | 15.0 |
| 9 | 44 | 38 | .537 | 16.0 | |
| 10 | 43 | 39 | .524 | 17.0 | |
| 11 |  Bucks - e | 32 | 50 | .390 | 28.0 |
| 12 |  Bulls - e | 31 | 51 | .378 | 29.0 |
| 13 |  Nets - e | 20 | 62 | .244 | 40.0 |
| 14 |  Pacers - e | 19 | 63 | .232 | 41.0 |
| 15 |  Wizards - e | 17 | 65 | .207 | 43.0 |
Hornets
Heat| Western | W | L | PCT | GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Thunder - z | 64 | 18 | .780 | |
| 2 |  Spurs - x | 62 | 20 | .756 | 2.0 |
| 3 |  Nuggets - x | 54 | 28 | .659 | 10.0 |
| 4 |  Lakers - x | 53 | 29 | .646 | 11.0 |
| 5 |  Rockets - x | 52 | 30 | .634 | 12.0 |
| 6 |  Timberwolves - x | 49 | 33 | .598 | 15.0 |
| 7 |  Suns - x | 45 | 37 | .549 | 19.0 |
| 8 |  Trail Blazers - x | 42 | 40 | .512 | 22.0 |
| 9 | 42 | 40 | .512 | 22.0 | |
| 10 | 37 | 45 | .451 | 27.0 | |
| 11 |  Pelicans - e | 26 | 56 | .317 | 38.0 |
| 12 |  Mavericks - e | 26 | 56 | .317 | 38.0 |
| 13 |  Grizzlies - e | 25 | 57 | .305 | 39.0 |
| 14 |  Kings - e | 22 | 60 | .268 | 42.0 |
| 15 |  Jazz - e | 22 | 60 | .268 | 42.0 |